Drunk In Charge
Under s4 Road Traffic Act 1988, the prosecution must prove that the Defendant was driving or in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or public place whilst unfit through drink or drugs. The driver does not have to be in excess of the prescribed limit for a prosecution to succeed.
a) In Charge
The test that should be used in deciding if a defendant was in charge should involve considering:
- where the defendant was sitting;
- what he was doing;
- where the keys were; and
- whether there was any evidence of the defendant having an intention to take control of the vehicle.
Being asleep at the wheel of a car with the key in the ignition could be found to be drunk in charge.
b) Whilst unfit
The Prosecution must introduce evidence of alcohol or drug consumption to the extent that it would have impaired a personís ability to drive. This can be done by producing evidential breath, blood or urine test results but is commonly achieved by introducing evidence about the manner of driving.
10 points or a discretionary ban plus a fine of up to £1000.
3 months custody is a possible penalty.
There is a statutory defence available to the offence under s 4 and 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.
The defendant must prove that it was more likely than not that he would not have driven so long as he remained unfit to do so in which case, he is not considered to be in charge.
The defendant must prove that it was more likely than not that he had no intention of driving whilst the level of alcohol in his breath, blood or urine remained above the prescribed limit in which case, he is not considered to be in charge.
How can Geoffrey Miller Solicitors help you from here?
Please take your time to browse through this site and to look at our video interviews with previous clients if you have not done so already.
If you would like to ask us more specific questions about how we may be able to assist you with your case, we are happy to communicate with you in via the 3 options listed below. WE DO NOT CHARGE FOR THE INITIAL ENQUIRY.